In a recent speech, President Joe Biden said efforts to reform the election were an “attack on Jim Crow in the 21st century” and “the most dangerous threat to voting and free and fair elections in our entire history.”
This applies to one of the most ridiculous things he has ever said. It also demonstrates a radical ignorance of the true history of Jim Crow. Unlike his angry accusations, the states are working to protect all voters and ensure a safe and secure election. This is not Jim Crowe.
Biden’s propaganda – there is no other word for his false claims – was to leave a special session in Philadelphia on July 13 by Texas Democratic lawmakers to leave the state and be called by Governor Greg Abbott to vote on electoral reform. Before discussing the unsubstantiated allegations, they should point out that by leaving the state, they are in fact demonstrating their contempt for the democratic process and evading their responsibility as legislators.
As Byron York, a Acesparks expert in Washington, D.C., made clear, “Republicans won the Texas House with an 83-to-67 advantage. [Democrats] is frustrating the will of the majority, and the rights of the Texans whose votes have turned Republicans into the majority – for the right to vote! “
JOHN JAMES REQUIRES “STRUCTURED”: GO TO DETROIT TO SEE “PART 21 JIM CROW”.
And what are they up against? Keep in mind that Texas has long been involved in election fraud, including in recent years. There are many proven cases listed in the Election Fraud Database run by the Heritage Foundation. And not to mention the brutality of this 13th ballot, Used by Lyndon Johnson to steal his 1948 election to the U.S. Senate. In Texas, voters have had problems with kamikas used by political operatives to coerce and intimidate voters using fireplaces. There are even special name for them in Texas: “politiqueras.”
For personal voting, Texas has had voter ID cards for several years. Texas will give free certificates and texas to a person who does not already exist, including minority voters – who did not face any problems in voting. With the significant exclusion of external voting, Texas wants to increase the security of the voting process for candidates by conveying an identity request to the ballot.
The suggested The House bill provides the voter with this requirement simply by entering the voter’s driver’s license or toll-free ID number. If the voter does not have an identity card, he or she can use the last four digits of his or her social security number. If he is one of the almost non-existent Americans who does not have an Social Security number, he can simply sign an application stating that he does not have an ID card or Social Security number.
GUTFELD RIPS has been dubbed the “TALOGIC LIAR”
But it’s a very heavy and discriminatory thing against black voters, and it means “suppressing voters,” said Democrats fleeing Texas, including Michelle Beckley, a member of parliament. claimed this “makes it difficult to vote by mail.” When considering this simple and easily satisfying demand, it is hard not to laugh at such a nonsensical claim, last poll shows that 84% of minority voters support voter identification.
Texas even wants to give voters who have used a ballot a chance to correct a defect in their ballot, such as forgetting to sign it before sending it to election agents. You probably haven’t heard a single word about it objectively.
Click here to receive feedback
Texas Democrats are also complaining about a rule that requires anyone (other than election officials) to “help” a voter fill out a form with the assistant’s name, address, and other information, such as his or her relative or ID. political operative. This allows voters to identify the person who illegally intimidated or pressured the voter.
No one who obeys the law will object to such a demand. But spokeswoman Beckley said the condition “makes it easier to prosecute people who have helped by mail and personal voters.” He’s really right about that, but he doesn’t want to sue the political agencies that illegally coerced voters.
Democrats do not want to guarantee the currency of the election process in advance. Election observers are the key to fair elections. That is why our State Department sends observers to emerging democracies around the world, and the 1965 Voting Rights Act had a whole section authorizing federal observers. Nevertheless, in recent elections, we have seen cases of trusted observers being excluded from voting activities in order to vote and to remove ballots from polling stations or to make effective observation impossible.
Thus, the Texas bill states that in addition to watching voters cast their ballots, observers “may not be prohibited from free movement in election locations” and have the right to sit or stand close enough to see and hear activities. “Note that observers cannot interfere in the election process and can be expelled if they” violated the peace or violated the law. “But election commissions cannot refuse to give observers access to them under the law. This is not discriminatory and Jim Crowe no; this is good government.
Biden said the work that states are doing is “harmful.” No, the angry lies he and other liberals are spreading about healthy electoral reforms sponsored by state lawmakers who have done their best to protect the integrity of the franchise for all Americans are dangerous.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM HANS VON SKOVSKY